RE: "and then," or simply "then"?

Subject: RE: "and then," or simply "then"?
From: "Gordon McLean" <gordon -dot- mclean -at- ciboodle -dot- com>
To: "'Sean Brierley'" <sbrierley -at- Accu-Time -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:40:57 +0100

Because I can?

(I meant the sarcastic answers could go on all day Sean, you've made your
point!)

-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+gordon -dot- mclean=ciboodle -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+gordon -dot- mclean=ciboodle -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On
Behalf Of Sean Brierley
Sent: 23 September 2008 14:41
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: RE: "and then," or simply "then"?

Well, the reader doesn't trip over incorrect use of grammar. Incorrect use
of grammar can cause the reader's attention to be drawn away from your
message and hinder your attempt to communicate clearly. To a slight degree,
with some readers, your work might lose some credibility.

I agree, that not all readers will notice or care. But, why ignore the part
of your audience who would?

I'm not sure we can do this all day. I wonder why, if correct grammar is
readable and gets the point across clearly, you would use incorrect grammar.

Cheers,

Sean



-----Original Message-----
From: Gordon McLean [mailto:gordon -dot- mclean -at- ciboodle -dot- com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 9:34 AM
To: Sean Brierley; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: RE: "and then," or simply "then"?


Conversely, what does the reader GAIN?

We could do this all day you know... ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+gordon -dot- mclean=ciboodle -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+gordon -dot- mclean=ciboodle -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com]
On Behalf Of Sean Brierley
Sent: 23 September 2008 14:33
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: RE: "and then," or simply "then"?

No, what I'm saying is if you have two options, both of which get the
point across in a clear way, and one of which is grammatically correct
and the other grammatically incorrect, why not choose the one that is
grammatically correct? What do you have to lose by getting the point
across AND being grammatically correct?

Cheers,

Sean

-----Original Message-----
From: Gordon McLean [mailto:gordon -dot- mclean -at- ciboodle -dot- com]
<snip>

Are you saying that option 1 fails to get the information across to the
user because it is grammatically incorrect?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help gives you everything you need to author and
publish quality Help, Web, and print content. Perfect for technical
authors, developers, and policy writers. Download a FREE trial.
http://www.componentone.com/DocToHelp/

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as gordon -dot- mclean -at- ciboodle -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/gordon.mclean%40ciboodle.
com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.



____________________________________________________________________________________________________
This email (and any attachments) is private and confidential, and is intended solely for the
addressee. If you have received this communication in error please remove it and inform us via
telephone or email. Although we take all possible steps to ensure mail and attachments
are free from malicious content, malware and viruses, we cannot accept any responsibility
whatsoever for any changes to content outwith our administrative bounds. The views represented
within this mail are solely the view of the author and do not reflect the views of the organisation
as a whole.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
ciboodle Ltd - (a wholly owned subsidiary of Sword Group)
Registered in Scotland company no. SC143434
Registered Office India of Inchinnan, Renfrewshire, Scotland PA4 9LH

http://www.ciboodle.com/
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help gives you everything you need to author and
publish quality Help, Web, and print content. Perfect for technical
authors, developers, and policy writers. Download a FREE trial.
http://www.componentone.com/DocToHelp/

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: "and then," or simply "then"?: From: Gordon McLean
RE: "and then," or simply "then"?: From: Sean Brierley

Previous by Author: RE: "and then," or simply "then"?
Next by Author: RE: "and then," or simply "then"?
Previous by Thread: RE: "and then," or simply "then"?
Next by Thread: RE: "and then," or simply "then"?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads