TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: What Program Do You Use for Software Documentation?
Subject:RE: What Program Do You Use for Software Documentation? From:"Combs, Richard" <richard -dot- combs -at- Polycom -dot- com> To:"Leonard C. Porrello" <Leonard -dot- Porrello -at- SoleraTec -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:58:22 -0600
Leonard C. Porrello wrote:
> A hammer is a fine tool for smashing your thumb, but it stinks for
> authoring documents that call for sophisticated single sourcing and
> reuse. Similarly, Word is a great tool for some ends. So is
FrameMaker.
> However, neither Word nor FrameMaker facilitate sophisticated single
> sourcing or reuse ("snippets"). If you don't need those things,
> fantastic. Word or FrameMaker may be just the ticket; if you do,
you'll
> want to avoid both Word and FrameMaker and look to H&M, Flare,
RoboHelp
> or AuthorIt.
Nonsense. Countless tech writers have been single-sourcing manuals and
online help with a hammer -- I mean with FrameMaker -- for years. There
are several competing products available that facilitate doing so:
ePublisher Pro, Mif2Go, Adobe Technical Publications Suite (with
integrated FrameMaker and RoboHelp versions). All enable as much
"sophistication" (if not more) than the tools you mentioned.
It's not clear what you mean by "reuse ('snippets')," but if you're
thinking of a database-driven solution, I understand from those who've
done it (I haven't) that implementing it with FrameMaker is far easier
than the alternatives.
I used RoboHelp heavily in the past, but that was for a client who
wanted online help only. At that time (the eHelp days), you couldn't pay
me enough to use RH for print/PDF delivery. Maybe that's changed, but
I'll bet dollars to donuts that the FM+RH solution offered in the Adobe
TPS is far more capable and less aggravating.
Someone else will have to stick up for Word. I could, but my heart
wouldn't be in it. ;-)
Richard
Richard G. Combs
Senior Technical Writer
Polycom, Inc.
richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom
303-223-5111
------
rgcombs AT gmailDOTcom
303-777-0436
------
ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals. http://www.doctohelp.com
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-