TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: The case against M$ Word From:Joel <eleysium -at- gmail -dot- com> To:"Gary Schnabl" <gSchnabl -at- livernoisyards -dot- com> Date:Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:53:54 -0400
Frame is not "nearing its EOL." Another version is in the pipeline in
addition to the one that came out last year.
JW
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:59 AM, Gary Schnabl
<gSchnabl -at- livernoisyards -dot- com>wrote:
> quills -at- airmail -dot- net wrote:
> > InDesign is focused upon page layout, and isn't in the same niche as
> > FrameMaker. And if FrameMaker is more than your company needs, then
> > (and I say this without knowing just what your company needs)
> > InDesign is probably more than it needs too.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> My guess is that FrameMaker is nearing its EOL, and that InDesign will
> eventually totally replace it. Those FrameMaker areas/functions that
> InDesign couldn't do are disappearing fast as InDesign CSx gets further
> and further developed. And the cost differential between FrameMaker and
> InDesign is minimal.
>
> Furthermore, if the relatively low cost for either FM or ID (or
> whatever) matters, get a legal copy via eBay or elsewhere.
>
> As for me, I'd use whatever works best or easiest of all the packages I
> generally use: OpenOffice v. 3, Office Pro 2007, FrameMaker, or
> InDesign, among others. Somehow, I cannot see wasting much time and
> effort arguing that point.
>
> Being an FAA-rated A&P mechanic, I and other mechanics amass and use
> various tools. We would rarely waste time debating the value of one over
> the other. Just use the proper/best tool for the particular function.
>
> Gary
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
> solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
> HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.
>http://www.doctohelp.com
>
> Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
> authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
> once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control!
>http://www.helpandmanual.com/
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as eleysium -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit
>http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/eleysium%40gmail.com
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.
>
> Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
>http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals. http://www.doctohelp.com
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-