RE: Windows 3.1 to Windows 95

Subject: RE: Windows 3.1 to Windows 95
From: "Leonard C. Porrello" <Leonard -dot- Porrello -at- SoleraTec -dot- com>
To: <quills -at- airmail -dot- net>, "Sarah Blake" <Sarah -dot- Blake -at- microfocus -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 08:05:25 -0800

Your inferential leap is too big for me, so I don't see how your
conclusion follows.

I need to see the steps between "If they did tailor Word
for the casual user, and not the professional power user" and "it
is TOTALLY unsuited to our needs".

Leonard

-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+leonard -dot- porrello=soleratec -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+leonard -dot- porrello=soleratec -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- c
om] On Behalf Of quills -at- airmail -dot- net
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 7:55 AM
To: Sarah Blake; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: RE: Windows 3.1 to Windows 95

Ok, then lets look at Word with this view. If they did tailor Word
for the casual user, and not the professional power user, then what
can we say about it's use as a technical writing tool?

The first thing that comes to mind, if the above is true, is that it
is TOTALLY unsuited to our needs.

If it isn't tweaked and maximized for professional use it will cause
problems at all levels of complexity and implementation. It would
throw obstacles in the way of its use as a technical writing tool.

Scott

At 11:07 AM +0000 11/4/08, Sarah Blake wrote:
> > It seems to me that Microsoft devoted their efforts with Office
2007
>to the
>> casual user, failing to take into consideration the skilled users
who
>rely
>> on advanced functions.
>
>I agree with this completely. It seems to be far easier to access the
>kind of basic formatting and layout functions that casual or basic
users
>usually want, but the more advanced features that I use all the time
>take quite some unearthing to find.
>
>> One of the mantras of technical communication is audience analysis
>which
>> should also apply to software development. I'm of the opinion that
>Microsoft
>> devoted their efforts to those who're not skilled with the tool and
>forgot
>> about those of us who use it for a living.
>
>However, it is entirely possible that they /did/ analyse their
audience;
>how many people are there out there who use Word in the ways that we
do,
>compared with the number who just want to get a basic document down on
>paper?
>
>That I don't like it doesn't necessarily mean they didn't do the best
>thing for their business; as companies have an irritating habit of
>doing...
>
>Sarah Blake
>Senior Technical Author
>Micro Focus
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and
publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.
http://www.doctohelp.com

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control!
http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as
Leonard -dot- Porrello -at- soleratec -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/leonard.porrello%40so
leratec.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.
http://www.doctohelp.com

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: A doozy even for Word (Joe Armstrong): From: Cardimon, Craig
Windows 3.1 to Windows 95: From: Paul Hanson
Re: Windows 3.1 to Windows 95: From: quills
Re: Windows 3.1 to Windows 95: From: Mike Starr
RE: Windows 3.1 to Windows 95: From: Sarah Blake
RE: Windows 3.1 to Windows 95: From: quills

Previous by Author: RE: phone interviews
Next by Author: RE: Is there a study on reading warnings, notes?
Previous by Thread: RE: Windows 3.1 to Windows 95
Next by Thread: Re: Windows 3.1 to Windows 95


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads