TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Proper definition for "acronym" (was A vs, an)
Subject:RE: Proper definition for "acronym" (was A vs, an) From:Fred Ridder <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com> To:<daviddowning -at- users -dot- com> Date:Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:06:19 -0500
Replying to Leonard Porello's comment about how
"many words formed from initials defy easy categorization"
David Downing asked:> Can you provide some examples of what you mean?
I can't speak to what Leonard was specifically thinking of, the
lengthy Wikipedia article on acronyms identifies several classes
that don't fit neatly into the usual definitions.
Among the challenging cases are acronyms that have lost their
underlying expansion (e.g. there is no longer a British Petroleum
that is abbreviated as BP, and DVD no longer stands for either
"digital video disc" or "digital versatile disc"), recursive acronyms
(e.g. GNU stands for "GNU's not Unix"), and backronyms (cases
where an English phrase is created to match the letters of a
word or abbreviation that originated in some other way.)
> There's also another hybrid where the first letter is pronounced as a
> letter and the rest is pronounced as a word. The only example I can
> think of is JPEG, pronounced, "jay-peg," but I know there are others.
Dozens and dozens of them, many of which a lot of us use quite
frequently in our documents (technical communication tie-in for a
pretty marginal thread...) and some of which refer to products and
systems we use every day. Just a few off the top of my head:
ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals. http://www.doctohelp.com
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-