TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Studies relating to documentation density and getting the user to read the manuals
Subject:RE: Studies relating to documentation density and getting the user to read the manuals From:"Al Geist" <al -dot- geist -at- geistassociates -dot- com> To:"'Dan Goldstein'" <DGoldstein -at- riverainmedical -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:48:09 -0500
Users are more apt to read content that quickly answers their questions,
thus reducing downtime and subsequent pressure from their managers. However,
with that said, users will always blame the "documentation" when they (the
users) screw up something because they didn't read the documentation. It's
part of the business and in my near 40 years of writing, I have yet to see a
change in that arena. I always strive to put out the best documentation I
can under the circumstances I am forced to operate, and I always try to
improve existing documentation when I have the chance (not often). I also
use a lot of warnings, cautions, and notes in the procedures to make sure
that the user understands that if they do not perform this step they will
probably die. If someone blows up a robot, destroys a multi-million dollar
system, or croaks because they skimmed over the part that says to
lockout/tag out the system prior to servicing, and then blames their problem
on poor documentation, I can always point out that "I told you so."
I used to worry about all those warnings, but I realized that there are some
that just won't follow directions if their lives depended on it. They're the
ones that says the "docs suck" without taking them off the shelf.
Al Geist
Technical Communicator, Help, Web Design, Video, Photography
Office/Msg: 802-872-9190
Cell: 802-578-3964
E-mail: al -dot- geist -at- geistassociates -dot- com
Website: www.geistassociates.com
See Also:
Fine Art Photography
Website: www.geistarts.com
"...I walked to work, quit my job, and kept walking. Better to be a pilgrim
without a destination, I figured, than to cross the wrong threshold each
day." (Sy Safransky)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The Documentation Doctor
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 4:59 AM
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: Studies relating to documentation density and
> getting the user to read the manuals
>
> I'm hoping I can tap your collective wisdom.
>
> A client has the common problem that users don't read the
> installation manuals.
>
> Historically, the response has been to beef up the
> installation manuals with big warning boxes highlighting the
> importance of particular steps; so much so that the warnings
> duplicate about 30% of the procedure. In addition, to make
> the manuals more friendly, each and every dialogue box and
> message is documented and illustrated. Even so, users still
> tend to skim, skip steps and get into a mess.
>
> My contention is that users are more likely to read
> documentation that is terse and does not contain redundant
> information, and that a single "Follow the steps or suffer
> the consequences" warning will suffice.
>
> So, what I'd be grateful for would be links to any studies
> that I could cite in order to support (or invalidate!) my position.
>
ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals. http://www.doctohelp.com
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-