TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Someone to do the "donkey work"? From:Evelyn Lee Barney <evbarney -at- comcast -dot- net> To:Paul Hanson <phanson -at- Quintrex -dot- com> Date:Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:02:26 -0500
This hit home since I've spent (in my worst moods it feels like WASTED)
a lot of time lately havening to search for appropriate images for some
promotional material. The boss sent me some - but said she trusted my
choices and I didn't' have to use them. Sine the resolution on her
choices were really low, and there was too much detail for the size they
would be in print - I went looking for alternatives. When I submitted
the proofs - she said she was disappointed I hadn't used her images. So
- once again - I had to explain why a 72 dpi image taken from our web
publications (I use 96 - 100, but these were created before my time)
are a bad choice for print. More - even an image with good resolution
will look like crap if it has text details (some of these were
explanations of geometry problems, lots of text: letters and numbers
with graphics) that were created in a 5 x 5 inch format and you want
them reduced to an inch by an inch. FYI none of these were vector images.
As others here have said, "no job is too big or too small" -- but it's
still frustrating when I feel like it's repetitive and a waste of time.
Siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigh,
Ev
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geoff Hart
> <snip>
> fwiw, this kind of thing can be automated reasonably well. If you're
> using Word, for instance, create autocorrect shortcuts for each
> hyperlink, and distribute those to the whole writing team. If you're
> using software (e.g., Frame, Blaze) that supports variables, define
> the hyperlinks as variables and distribute those definitions too. If
> your software provides neither feature, create a single file that
> contains a master list of all file locations, store it on the network
> where everyone can reach it, and let your writers copy and paste the
> links instead of having to hunt them down each time. When a link
> changes, remind everyone to update their autocorrects, variables, or
> whatever you're using to store this information.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals. http://www.doctohelp.com
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-