TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: text in tables -- smaller than or same size as regular body text
Subject:RE: text in tables -- smaller than or same size as regular body text From:"Combs, Richard" <richard -dot- combs -at- Polycom -dot- com> To:"Milan Davidovic" <milan -dot- lists -at- gmail -dot- com>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:34:16 -0600
Milan Davidovic wrote:
> I'm looking at a user's manual. I do not have access to the original
> author and therefore have to guess at their intentions.
>
> Looking at the paragraph styles, I see that the various table body
> (i.e. not heading) styles are in a smaller point size than the regular
> body style.
>
> In looking at other books I have close at hand, I see only table body
> text at about the same size (i.e. not obviously smaller, though I
> didn't get a point ruler out to be sure) as regular body text.
>
> Any thoughts on why table body text should be smaller?
I think it's fairly common. We use 10-pt Book Antiqua for body text and
9-pt Arial for table text. Table headings are 9-pt Arial bold. I'm
rather aesthetically challenged, but I like the look of a sans serif
font in tables.
Tables often have relatively narrow columns (compared to body text), and
smaller text helps to minimize the number of lines with just a word or
two on them -- which can hinder readability as much or more than the
smaller font size.
My primary deliverables are PDFs, secondary are help files. In both
cases, we old fogies can (as Geoff noted) easily increase the size on
screen if we need to. :-) If your primary deliverables are hard copy,
smaller fonts are more of an issue. But 9 points is still (barely)
adequate, IMHO. Of course, my target audience is on average quite a bit
younger than me. Know your audience, right?
Richard
Richard G. Combs
Senior Technical Writer
Polycom, Inc.
richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom
303-223-5111
------
rgcombs AT gmailDOTcom
303-777-0436
------
ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals. http://www.doctohelp.com
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-