TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Robert, I don't think Geoff is arguing for more screenshots of menus. I guess he's talking about this sort of thing:
- an icon or control that can't be identified until you hover over it and which may not have an obvious menu equivalent
- an option that's buried several clicks deep in a series of menus, dialog boxes and tabs
- a feature that you accidentally hide or move, and there's no obvious way to "put it back the way it was"
Some examples would be:
- the middle-click scroll feature in Firefox, Word, etc.
- the Hide White Space feature in Word (click between pages in Print Layout View)
- dragging or hiding views in Eclipse (very easy to do by accident)
- the Resize control in the Word vertical scroll bar (which only has a tooltip once it's already been used!)
- the Ctrl Alt Hyphen feature in Word, which I regularly switch on by mistake when trying to insert an em dash
Some things that would help users to learn about and deal with these features:
- A visual index of controls and pointer icons, as Geoff suggests
- A heavily annotated master screen shot giving labels to unnamed controls
- A way to look up keyboard shortcuts (you use the right shortcut in the wrong application--the screen flickers and you think, oh dear, what did I just do...?)
Robert Lauriston wrote:
> Yeah, it's very annoying when docs don't tell you how to navigate to
> the command / dialog being discussed, but screenshots of menus just
> clutter up the doc and waste the writer's time.
>
> My negative attitude about that sort of thing was probably exacerbated
> by having inherited so many docs that contained nothing but a useless
> narrative of the UI.
>
>> The second is that most documentation provides no way to
>> look up things you can see on the screen. I've occasionally had
>> problems with Adobe documentation, for example, because
>> they'll write something like "to fram statically, use the
>> framistat tool" without showing me what that tool looks like
>> or where it's hidden.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals. http://www.doctohelp.com
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-