TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Oh, no - not another learning experience!! From:Kathleen MacDowell <kathleen -at- writefortheuser -dot- com> To:Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> Date:Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:26:41 -0500
II suspect the real issue here is clarity rather than correctness. Perhaps
your partner in this endeavor is a lawyer? (This is based on experience with
my HOA's Covenants and Bylaws and the poor writing, contradictions
throughout.)
Perhaps you could convince your colleague to adopt some other wording so
that people won't have to do a logic diagram to understand the content?
Regards,
Kathleen
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> wrote:
> If the document specifies a difference between "Party" and "party" with a
> defining statement, such as "the Whig Party (hereafter referred to as "the
> Party")," then "Mike" is correct. In the absence of such a statement,
> there is
> no inherent difference in context and capitalization may be interpreted as
> merely an effort to make something more conspicuous.
>
> Gene Kim-Eng
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Susan Hogarth" <hogarth -at- gmail -dot- com>
> To which he somewhat patronizingly replied:
>
> > As for the "any other party" part, the difference is between the
> > non-capitalized "party" as in another political party, versus the
> > capitalized (and defined in the Bylaws) "Party" as being distinct from
> > each other. It's not confusing at all if you follow the context
> correctly.
>
> Your verdict, Members of the Jury?
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
> Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
> 2009 tips, tricks, and best practices.
>http://www.doctohelp.com/SuperPages/Webcasts/
>
> Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
> authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
> once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control!
>http://www.helpandmanual.com/
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as kathleen -at- writefortheuser -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit
>http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/kathleen%40writefortheuser.com
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.
>
> Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
>http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat
>
>
>
--
Kathleen MacDowell
www.writefortheuser.com
kathleen -at- writefortheuser -dot- com
kathleen -dot- eamd -at- gmail -dot- com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices. http://www.doctohelp.com/SuperPages/Webcasts/
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-