Re: A little respect for "unvalidated"

[quills -at- airmail -dot- net]

Within a quality assurance process this definition is perfectly 
understandable and is correct usage. Checking code to ensure it meets 
the standard, either for coding language or to the specification can 
produce either invalid code, or unvalid code. In the first instance, if 
it doesn't meet the DTD the code is invalid. In the second instance QA 
can reject it as unvalidated by the specification. So you can have valid 
written code that is unvalid according to the specification.

Scott

Gene Kim-Eng wrote:
> "Unvalidated" = not proven to be accurate or true. "Invalidated" = proven to 
> be inaccurate or untrue.
> 
> "Unvalidated" means your product or data has not successfully completed the 
> process that verifies or "validates" it.  This can mean you haven't 
> submitted it to the process yet, haven't completed the process yet, or have 
> failed it (in the eyes of the regulators, failing is the same as not being 
> tested, because validation is a go/no-go decision).  You haven't passed yet; 
> try again when you think you've got the problem fixed.
> 
> "Invalidated," OTOH, means that at one point you were considered "validated" 
> and that validation has been withdrawn.  The regulating agency's process of 
> verification through testing and data collection, or worse, your actions in 
> attempting to pass that process, is now suspect.  This can mean you will not 
> be able to retest a revised product until the regulating agency has 
> conducted a thorough review of its own processes and procedures and made any 
> necessary revisions (massive delay in product release schedules for every 
> company in the industry), or the auditors will be coming next Tuesday to 
> turn your entire process upside down and shake it for flaws and/or 
> corruption and every product you've successfully validated in the past may 
> be subject to review.  Your company's stock loses 90% of its value overnight 
> and "60 Minutes" may have a camera crew waiting for your CEO next time 
> he/she heads for the office.
> 
> Not confusing at all.
> 
> Gene Kim-Eng
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Robert Lauriston" <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
>> "I wonder how many people would ever be confused by 'un' in front of a
>> word that they knew."
>>
>> Most of my dictionaries don't define "unvalidated." The OED defines it
>> as "not validated or proven to be accurate or true."
>>
>> If in the medical device field "unvalidated" means the device failed a
>> validation test, then that usage would confuse me.
> 
> 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help  
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices.
http://www.doctohelp.com/SuperPages/Webcasts/

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- 

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info. 

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat