RE: A little respect for "unvalidated"

Subject: RE: A little respect for "unvalidated"
From: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
To: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>, "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:37:08 -0400

Gene Kim-Eng top-post replied (without ">" indenting...):

> If you've not worked in an industry where validation is a
> process mandated by
> law that has enough booby traps that it usually requires
> training to navigate
> rather than a word you can look up in the dictionary or OED,
> that wouldn't be a
> surprise.
>
> Other industries: as previously mentioned, so far I can check off
> aircraft/aerospace and medical/biotech/pharma as areas where
> the definitions I
> posted will be readily recognized. It's hit and miss in telecom.
>
> Gene Kim-Eng
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
> Well that meaning of invalidated carries an exclusion that I
> don't normally
> apprehend. I've never read (or used) the word to mean that
> you (your product,
> service, etc.) had to have previously been in "validated" state.
>
> To me, all it's ever meant is that you have undergone the testing or
> verification procedure this time (whether it's the first-ever
> or the hundredth)
> and failed. To me, the key to "invalidated" is only that the
> attempt has
> occurred in the instance where the term is applied. I've never needed
> "invalidated" to further assert "has undergone the testing in
> the past and has
> passed/succeeded".
>
> Now I'd wonder if that nuance/baggage carries over to other
> industries.
>
> What's the OED got to say? :-)
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

So, "invalidated", in those industries, refers only to items (systems, processes, whatever) that have previously been successfully validated, and are in currently validated state when the test is applied... and this time they've failed. So, the named industries have another word that conveys "found to be invalid or not validatable, but this was the first-ever attempt, so it was not previously in validated state", yes? What would that word be?

- Kevin

The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer without copying
or disclosing it.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices.
http://www.doctohelp.com/SuperPages/Webcasts/

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


Follow-Ups:

References:
A little respect for "unvalidated": From: Dan Goldstein
RE: A little respect for "unvalidated": From: Combs, Richard
RE: A little respect for "unvalidated": From: Handy, David
RE: A little respect for "unvalidated": From: Dan Goldstein
Re: A little respect for "unvalidated": From: Robert Lauriston
RE: A little respect for "unvalidated": From: McLauchlan, Kevin
Re: A little respect for "unvalidated": From: Robert Lauriston
Re: A little respect for "unvalidated": From: Gene Kim-Eng
RE: A little respect for "unvalidated": From: McLauchlan, Kevin
Re: A little respect for "unvalidated": From: Gene Kim-Eng

Previous by Author: RE: A little respect for "unvalidated"
Next by Author: RE: A little respect for "unvalidated"
Previous by Thread: Re: A little respect for "unvalidated"
Next by Thread: RE: A little respect for "unvalidated"


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads