TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Your terminology seems really more about distribution than
confidentiality. I'd be explicit rather than creative:
public
customers only
under NDA only
internal only
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:07 AM, voxwoman <voxwoman -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> I've had my wrist slapped in the past for using the term "Confidential" in a
> non-security-clearance context. People who have worked in government
> settings do not want to see "confidential" or "secret" on documents that
> don't require a security clearance.
>
> After thinking about it, I came up with this list:
>
> Public - anyone
> Member (only) - customers or prospects
> Private - NDA required
> Restricted - employees only (might there be some further restrictions as to
> level of employee who can see certain information?)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices. http://www.doctohelp.com/SuperPages/Webcasts/
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
