TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: in search for better tools From:beelia <beelia -at- gmail -dot- com> To:Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> Date:Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:43:23 -0800
Gene,
I led an Interleaf team at McDonnell-Douglas in 1988-89. I remember those
long Interleaf menus, and IIRC, that was when the issue of multiple undos
arose. Although Interleaf later produced individual PC licenses that never
caught on, it was a big institutional UNIX-based product that was expensive
to implement. Maybe that, rather than neat features like multiple/undo, is
why FrameMaker ended up taking over the desktop publishing market. But it's
an academic digression.
By commenting on this interesting little sidelight, I'm hoping to soften the
focus on this undead topic, which I am just about to flog.
If I used the Feedback feature, my GUI developers would automatically know
about it, because they lock down server requests to only those that are
valid. A call to any unknown external site would be a red flag, and would be
found by QA long before the software was released.
I've been told that this is a common development standard, so software that
would not keep a PUP from being deployed would be the responsibility of the
local developer. After all, who would get sued if there was a spyware crisis
of biblical proportions? I suspect it would be the software developers'
company, not the providers of the help tool. (I suppose that's debatable -
jury verdicts are not predictable, and besides, this too is an academic
question.)
It would be nice if Flare Engineering provided an "on/off" option for its
customer to provide to the end user, but I personally think (and my
colleagues agree) that it would be more of a courtesy than a responsibility.
Oh well. Guess I wasn't into accomplishing anything today anyway. ;-)
Bee
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> wrote:
> I remember asking about it when Frame was still only delivering on turnkey
> workstations. The company I was working for at the time ended up choosing
> Interleaf, primarily because of the lack of this feature.
>
> Gene Kim-Eng
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert Lauriston" <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
> > FrameMaker 7.2 in 2005. It would be interesting to know when the first
> > feature request for multiple undo was received. Probably prior to
> > Adobe's acquisition in 1995.
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
> build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
> Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at:
>http://www.doctohelp.com/
>
> Help & Manual 5: The all-in-one help authoring tool. True single- sourcing
> --
> generate 8 different formats and as many different versions as you need
> from just one project. Fast and intuitive. http://www.helpandmanual.com/
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as beelia -at- pacbell -dot- net -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit
>http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/beelia%40pacbell.net
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.
>
> Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
>http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at: http://www.doctohelp.com/
Help & Manual 5: The all-in-one help authoring tool. True single- sourcing --
generate 8 different formats and as many different versions as you need
from just one project. Fast and intuitive. http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-