TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
So, you've never looked at something that somebody thought was a good idea and decided:
a) that it wasn't really such a good idea
or
b) that there's nothing wrong with the idea, but we don't have time or resources
or
c) its a good idea, but we're getting some new infrastructure next year, so there's no
point expending the effort to patch the current process when it's all going to change anyway...
You wouldn't consider performing the research, discussion and evaluation on any of
those three to be "addressing" them?
- K
________________________________
From: kathleen -at- writefortheuser -dot- com [mailto:kathleen -at- writefortheuser -dot- com]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 10:14 AM
To: McLauchlan, Kevin
Cc: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: RE: Address this. . .
Kevin,
Your use could be the standard language that is used in Release Notes, but on first glance, I'd read "To be addressed..." as "will be fixed."
I doubt I'd think twice about it either, which why I, and probably many other people, are annoyed when such bugs aren't fixed.
E.G., everyone's on-going complaint about some of the "features" in MS Word, etc.
LOL, now I know why!
To avoid misinterpretation, you might use a term such as "considered," although I imagine company's prefer a more ambiguous term.
Kathleen
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Address this. . .
> From: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
> Date: Fri, March 12, 2010 8:55 am
> To: "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
>
>
> All,
>
> I'm getting push-back on some standard language in our Release Notes.
>
> In the list of issues/bugs that are not being fixed for the current
> release, we say "To be addressed in a future release".
>
> We carefully don't even say "next" release.
>
> But the problem is the word "addressed".
>
> Some customer has decided that "To be addressed in a future release"
> means "...an explicit prmise that the issue is to be fixed exactly how I want it".
[...]
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer without copying
or disclosing it.
Use Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word, or HTML and
produce desktop, Web, or print deliverables. Just write (or import)
and Doc-To-Help does the rest. Free trial: http://www.doctohelp.com
Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at: http://www.ModernAnalyst.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-