TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: How do hiring companies view TW resumes? From:<kathleen -at- writefortheuser -dot- com> To:"Peter Neilson" <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net> Date:Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:27:49 -0700
No evidence about the spelling question. But recruiters are pulling up
resumes to look at according to the keywords, so maybe you could leave
esoteric terms out unless they're requested in the ad.
Kathleen
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: How do hiring companies view TW resumes?
> From: Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
> Date: Tue, March 16, 2010 7:23 am
> To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
>
>
> My resume necessarily contains many arcane terms, some of which are
> flagged by MS Word as spelling errors. (Y'all's resumes have the same
> feature, of course.) Personally, I use MS Word's spelling correction
> magno cum grano salis, but I've just discovered, to my surprise, that
> some HR departments might be judging the soundness of a writer's ability
> by MS Word's count of misspellings in his resume.
>
> An agent at a placement firm asked me, "There seems to be a spelling
> error here, the word 'emergy'. That should be energy, right?" The word
> itself is cute, esoteric and unfortunate, but it was indeed the subject
> of a thesis that I helped a PhD candidate rewrite.
>
> I had a sinking feeling that my rejection for "perfect" job matches,
> getting no interview where it was rather clear to me that I was the most
> appropriate candidate, could be from my inability to spell that word
> "correctly."
>
> The next version of my resume will omit it.
>
> Does anyone else have evidence that HR people might be so misaligned
> with reality as to assume that they can spell technical terms better
> than tech writers?
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Use Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word, or HTML and
> produce desktop, Web, or print deliverables. Just write (or import)
> and Doc-To-Help does the rest. Free trial: http://www.doctohelp.com
>
> Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
> learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
> get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:
>http://www.ModernAnalyst.com
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as kathleen -at- writefortheuser -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/kathleen%40writefortheuser.com
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.
>
> Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
>http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat
Use Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word, or HTML and
produce desktop, Web, or print deliverables. Just write (or import)
and Doc-To-Help does the rest. Free trial: http://www.doctohelp.com
Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at: http://www.ModernAnalyst.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-