Re: Serif v. sans serif online readability

[Chris Morton <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com>]

Already looking ahead to Friday, I would *not* recommend this typeface:

http://new.myfonts.com/fonts/chank/collateral-damage/regular/

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:20 PM, <john -at- garisons -dot- com> wrote:

> One of the physicians I work with is looking into font and readability
> issues regarding a new electronic health record system we're implementing.
> If anyone has knowledge of recent studies on this, especially online at
> small sizes, I'd appreciate a link ... or three.
>
> JG
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Use Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word, or HTML and 
produce desktop, Web, or print deliverables. Just write (or import) 
and Doc-To-Help does the rest. Free trial: http://www.doctohelp.com


 - Use this space to communicate with TECHWR-L readers - 
   - Contact admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com for more information - 


---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- 

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info. 

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat