TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Information -- a working definition? From:Milan Davidović <milan -dot- lists -at- gmail -dot- com> To:Chris Despopoulos <despopoulos_chriss -at- yahoo -dot- com> Date:Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:08:37 -0400
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Chris Despopoulos
<despopoulos_chriss -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:
> It might be useful to actually try and define information..
Have there been past efforts to do so (within technical
communication), and if so what became of them?
This article from the journal Telecommunications Policy indicates the
challenges of defining information in another (though not necessarily
completely separate) domain, and may be of interest to our own: https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/braman/www/bramanpdfs/003_defining.pdf
Gain access to everything you need to create and publish documentation,
manuals, and other information through multiple channels. Choose
authoring (and import) as well as virtually any output you may need. http://www.doctohelp.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
