TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Writing a product functional spec AFTER the product is built
Subject:RE: Writing a product functional spec AFTER the product is built From:"McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com> To:Heather Anderson <Heather -dot- Anderson -at- cubrc -dot- org>, Tara English-Sweeney <tens00 -at- gmail -dot- com>, "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:56:31 -0400
Heather Anderson noted:
> I've worked on validation documents after the system was
> already completed and in use (and by that, I mean
> requirements documents, testing plans, etc.) and right now
> I'm working on a user guide for a system that's been
> completed for some time.
Wow. What a luxury!
I mostly create user docs for products that are anywhere
from pre-alpha to "just finished, gotta go out with the docs
today".
One of the dances is "this feature, right here - do I write
it up the way it's supposed to be at GA, or the way it's
working right now?"
The question is really: "Is it going to be fixed in time,
and work like it's supposed to work, or is this an item
that will be ... um... deferred, and I should describe it
more like it's current alpha implementation?"
What ends up happening in many cases is that the decision
is made to defer, then the beta customers complain and
the feature gets fixed, and I get to rewrite the day before
it goes to final QA. That's not so bad when it's just ONE
feature... :-)
Having to write docs for a product that had been completed
and stable and that I could test and tinker and see the
beast operating exactly as the customers would... wow.
Luxury indeed.
But that luxury isn't about to happen. We live in a market
where waiting to release a product for any amount of time
after it's finished would put us behind competitors. Or would
put us behind fast-advancing customer needs.
- Kevin
<bumpf-start> The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer without copying
or disclosing it.
Gain access to everything you need to create and publish information
through multiple channels. Your choice of authoring (and import)
formats with virtually any output. Try Doc-To-Help free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-