TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Certification: Ernest and Scribbler From:Bill Swallow <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com> To:Steven Jong <SteveFJong -at- comcast -dot- net> Date:Sat, 17 Jul 2010 14:09:14 -0400
So who's the good example and who's the bad example? I see pros and
cons with both of them.
> Ernest:
>
> Takes extra time to use variables for product and company names; keeps source files clean; uses styles or templates
> Copyedits (at least) all input
> Works to a plan
> Follows the style guide even if it's not very good
> Reports status
> Selects, captures, and crops screens wherever appropriate
> Explains what every menu selection does
> Takes time off for professional development
> Scribbler:
>
> Gets the work done fast and minimally; doesn't waste time fondling fonts
> Copies and pastes input--why monkey with what the SME said?
> Gets work done and turned around ASAP
> Improves on the style guide
> Is too busy writing to tell people about it
> Throws in screenshots wherever possible
> Shows where every menu selection goes
> Is good at the job and doesn't need to change
Gain access to everything you need to create and publish information
through multiple channels. Your choice of authoring (and import)
formats with virtually any output. Try Doc-To-Help free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-