Re: Certification: Ernest and Scribbler

["Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>]

I'm curious about what these "work artifacts" might be and how they expect 
applicants to obtain them for submission.  The issues some have mentioned with 
obtaining permission to use copies of proprietary or classified documents 
created would be child's play compared to trying to do it for things like 
project notebooks, plans, schedules, etc. , that were never published and almost 
always contain IP not included in finished documents.

Gene Kim-Eng


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Milan Davidovic" <milan -dot- lists -at- gmail -dot- com>
> The certification scheme,
> however, is concerned with evaluating and making claims about the
> expertise of individual practitioners. I think one big challenge will
> therefore be in setting the requirements for the "portfolios and work
> artifacts" such that the efforts of one individual can be clearly
> discerned from those of other participants.
>
> Has the Task Force kicked that one around yet?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Gain access to everything you need to create and publish information 
through multiple channels. Your choice of authoring (and import)
formats with virtually any output. Try Doc-To-Help free for 30-days. 
http://www.doctohelp.com/


---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- 

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info. 

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat