TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Using the conjunction OR in mutually exclusive options
Subject:Using the conjunction OR in mutually exclusive options From:Donna McManus <donna -dot- mcmanus -at- gmail -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Thu, 8 Sep 2011 15:48:06 -0400
All, I'm just gathering opinion. Feel free to opine away.
I am seeing the use of the conjunction OR in mutually exclusive options in
procedures. This is even given as an example in Microsoft's Manual of Style
(if you have the 3rd version, see p123):
To open a menu:
- Press Alt+the key for the underlined letter in the menu name
-or-
- Use the LEFT ARROW key or the RIGHT ARROW key to move to another menu
I'm more of the mind to write the procedure as:
Use one of two methods to open a menu:
- Press Alt+the key for the underlined letter in the menu name
- Use the LEFT ARROW key or the RIGHT ARROW key to move to another menu
What is your opinion? I can't quite put my finger on it, but it bugs me to
no end to have to be so explicit that we have to emphasize that two options
are mutually exclusive. Is this more for translation purposes that Microsoft
would recommend this?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-