Re: Original work [was RE: STC certification program:skepticalcurmudgeonlyness, part II]
There was a discussion here some years ago in which some argued that there was some sort of unquantifieable natural talent that made certain people naturally better at the job and that it wasn't just a series of skills and methods that anyone could learn if they worked hard enough at it. I don't remember offhand who it was, but I'm pretty sure it was no one who is still around post dotcom.
But what has that got to do with working in an artisan fashion vs. in an industrial fashion? Most of tech com today is done in artisan fashion. Most of the schools teach people to work in artisan fashion. To work artisan fashion simply means to do a small project by yourself from beginning to end on the desktop. Lots of people are still doing that post dotcom. Nothing to do with natural talent vs. being taught as far as I can see.
Is it simply that you are not understanding the term in the way I am using it, or do you genuinely think there is a connection here?
Marl
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.
http://www.doctohelp.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com
To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.
Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat
Follow-Ups:
- Re: Original work [was RE: STC certification program:skepticalcurmudgeonlyness, part II], Gene Kim-Eng
References:
RE: Original work [was RE: STC certification program: skeptical curmudgeonlyness, part II]: From: Janoff, Steve
RE: Original work [was RE: STC certification program: skepticalcurmudgeonlyness, part II]: From: Mark Baker
RE: Original work [was RE: STC certification program: skepticalcurmudgeonlyness, part II]: From: Janoff, Steve
RE: Original work [was RE: STC certification program: skepticalcurmudgeonlyness, part II]: From: Mark Baker
RE: Original work [was RE: STC certification program: skepticalcurmudgeonlyness, part II]: From: Janoff, Steve
Re: Original work [was RE: STC certification program: skepticalcurmudgeonlyness, part II]: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: Original work [was RE: STC certification program:skepticalcurmudgeonlyness, part II]: From: Mark Baker
Re: Original work [was RE: STC certification program:skepticalcurmudgeonlyness, part II]: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Previous by Author:
Re: Original work [was RE: STC certification program:skepticalcurmudgeonlyness, part II]
Next by Author:
Re: STC certification program
Previous by Thread:
Re: Original work [was RE: STC certification program:skepticalcurmudgeonlyness, part II]
Next by Thread:
Re: Original work [was RE: STC certification program:skepticalcurmudgeonlyness, part II]
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads