Re: More Low Paying Jobs
Peter said " There is another possibility--the job is advertised badly so
that it can be filled internally. They have someone picked out already, but
have to advertise outside. They want to spend as little time as possible
wading through applicants who might actually be qualified. "
That makes more sense, and I almost wish that is the case.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Peter Neilson<neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 15:12:50 -0500, Dan Goldstein<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
DGoldstein -at- riveraintech -dot- com> wrote:
I still don't see how a company could pass regulatory on digital avionic
products with an inexperienced technical editor. Unless... Is thisOf course! It's not an apprenticeship, because it's only a few months.
actually an editorial assistant to the real TW, who has the requisite
knowledge? If it's an apprenticeship, then the hourly wage makes sense.
Instead it's a>>technical typist<< shoehorned into a fancier job title.
They probably need someone who can transcribe printed docs, or who can
proofread stuff that's been badly ocr-ified. Should also be able to make
coffee without scalding herself, and watch the boss's child on occasion.
Military, aviation, etc. used to have a lot of people in this sort of
category, called secretaries, typists, filing clerks. Nearly all were
poorly paid and nearly all were female.
Underneath the glamor of the job title there is the understanding that
this person will have zero opportunity to screw things up by changing even
one word of text without approval.
I've known people who have held these jobs, and who seethed as they saw
technically inaccurate material pass through as they reformatted it, having
no authority even to mention the error to anyone who could fix it!
There is another possibility--the job is advertised badly so that it can
be filled internally. They have someone picked out already, but have to
advertise outside. They want to spend as little time as possible wading
through applicants who might actually be qualified.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^**^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with
Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.
Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.
http://bit.ly/doc-to-help
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^**^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as suzette -dot- leeming -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- **com<techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/**email-discussion-groups/<http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/>for more resources and info.
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
magazine at http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.
Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.
http://bit.ly/doc-to-help
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as jack -at- allrednet -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.
Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.
http://bit.ly/doc-to-help
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
Follow-Ups:
- Re: More Low Paying Jobs, voxwoman
References:
More Low Paying Jobs: From: Stephen Arrants
RE: More Low Paying Jobs: From: Combs, Richard
RE: More Low Paying Jobs: From: Dan Goldstein
Re: More Low Paying Jobs: From: Peter Neilson
Re: More Low Paying Jobs: From: Suzette Leeming
Previous by Author:
Re: I have been waiting my entire career to use that word in a technical context.
Next by Author:
Re: Windows Search alternatives
Previous by Thread:
Re: More Low Paying Jobs
Next by Thread:
Re: More Low Paying Jobs
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads