TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Most Current Versions From:Craig Cardimon <craig -dot- cardimon -at- gmail -dot- com> To:"Porrello, Leonard" <lporrello -at- illumina -dot- com> Date:Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:23:02 -0400
Nope.
Craig Cardimon - "The Duct Tape Writer"
Sent from my Droid X
On Mar 28, 2012 3:58 PM, "Porrello, Leonard" <lporrello -at- illumina -dot- com> wrote:
> So, in effect, you have "most current version" and "old current version"?
> Do you happen to work in a highly regulated industry?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cardimon, Craig [mailto:ccardimon -at- M-S-G -dot- com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 12:50 PM
> To: Porrello, Leonard; 'Bruce Megan (ST-CO/ENS2.5-NA)'; '
> techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com'
> Subject: RE: Most Current Versions
>
> At my work, we have far too many current version of my user guides
> floating around. We use "Most current" to mean the latest and greatest.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+ccardimon=m-s-g -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [mailto:
> techwr-l-bounces+ccardimon=m-s-g -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of
> Porrello, Leonard
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:50 PM
> To: Bruce Megan (ST-CO/ENS2.5-NA); techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: RE: Most Current Versions
>
> Is the "most" in "most current version" redundant? Why not say, "current
> version"? Please forgive me if I appear to be acting like a pedantic ass.
> That isn't my intention. I really do not see a semantic difference between
> the two phrases. Is there a subtle difference that I am missing?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+lporrello=illumina -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [mailto:
> techwr-l-bounces+lporrello=illumina -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of
> Bruce Megan (ST-CO/ENS2.5-NA)
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 10:14 AM
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: Most Current Versions
>
> Hi All:
>
> What are the most current versions of Microsoft Manual of Style and the
> Chicago Manual of Style?
>
> Thanks
> Megan
>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with
> Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.
>
> Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.
>
>http://bit.ly/doc-to-help
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as ccardimon -at- m-s-g -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives Information contained in
> this e-mail transmission is privileged and confidential. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, do not read, distribute or reproduce this
> transmission (including any attachments). If you have received this e-mail
> in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone or email reply.
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with
> Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.
>
> Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.
>
>http://bit.ly/doc-to-help
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as craig -dot- cardimon -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.
Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.