TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: been asked for advice by "non-writers"? From:Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> To:Ken Poshedly <poshedly -at- bellsouth -dot- net> Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2012 08:56:45 -0800
Well, in most cases the people reading the drawings don't spell any better
than the people making them.
However, this is one benefit of being included in the design reviews. As
long as they're going to have to go into the drawing to fix the technical
comments, it's no big deal to them to fix the spelling errors if someone
points them out.
Or, you could beat on the CAD managers' heads to get the engineers and
designers to leave the ACAD spell checker on.
Gene Kim-Eng
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Ken Poshedly <poshedly -at- bellsouth -dot- net> wrote:
>
> How is one supposed to have total faith in the data when even semi-common
> words
> on the engineering drawings are misspelled?
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Writer Tip: Create 10 different outputs with Doc-To-Help -- including Mobile and EPUB.