TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: What's the state of the Adobe Suite when it comes to Word Output
Subject:Re: What's the state of the Adobe Suite when it comes to Word Output From:Anne Robotti <arobotti -at- gmail -dot- com> To:"Combs, Richard" <richard -dot- combs -at- polycom -dot- com> Date:Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:59:59 -0500
But if you absolutely _must_ round-trip Word files (even though they're not
> intended to be an output format), then -- much as I love FM -- I'd say you
> ought to be authoring in Word.
>
But Richard, authoring a 400+ page document in Word presents its own perils
- if John said in his original post that he's using the Master Doc feature,
I missed it. I've had a Word doc just *blow up* at 550 pages, and it wasn't
pretty.
If John really isn't even halfway done with this doc, then just based on
the document length doesn't it seem like he should be working in Word?
Anne
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
See what's new in Doc-To-Help 2012 in a free webcast:
Read all about them: http://bit.ly/C1-webcast
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
