TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Adobe shifts to subscriptions for software package
Subject:Re: Adobe shifts to subscriptions for software package From:David Crosswell <davidcrosswell -at- internode -dot- on -dot- net> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Thu, 09 May 2013 06:28:35 +1000
On 09/05/13 02:05, Tony Chung wrote:
> I agree with Gene.
>
> PDF being an open standard means nothing. I refer specifically to the
> Adobe-Apple-Microsoft triangle, where Apple's antagonism to Adobe arrests
> applications like MS Office:Mac from creating bookmarks from headings.
> Vendors hope to lock their their users in with proprietary features and
> extensions. They will soon discover that the applications users find the
> easiest to use to get the job done will rise to the top.
And this is my objection to them.
All application interfaces are a compromise and a dictate on the quality
of the end work.
Frankly, I feel uncomfortable with that.
I also understand that is an individual choice to steer away from the
interface, but I think that more need to understand that it's one that
is there and available, as many seem to think that there is no more than
a choice between proprietary offerings.
That does nothing but gift market control and determine end product quality.
Cheers!
David.
>
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, there are many smaller apps that exist to perform some function or
>> set of functions that are desired by some but not by enough for Adobe to
>> add them to Acrobat. But nothing that attempts to be a total Acrobat
>> replacement product for professional users.
>>
>> Gene Kim-Eng
>>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >From our sponsor Doc-to-Help: Want to see a Doc-To-Help web-based Help sample with DISQUS for user commenting?
>
> Learn more: http://bit.ly/13xpg5n
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as davidcrosswell -at- internode -dot- on -dot- net -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
--
"Res publica non dominetur."
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>From our sponsor Doc-to-Help: Want to see a Doc-To-Help web-based Help sample with DISQUS for user commenting?