TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Contract work - 1099 or W-2? From:"William Sherman" <bsherman77 -at- embarqmail -dot- com> To:"Techwr-l" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Tue, 4 Jun 2013 21:12:46 -0400
Wow, I missed one of those discussions right up my alley.
W-2 or 1099. It really isn't that simple.
W-2 is if you are an employee. Most contracts you get calls about are
really about you being an employee of the contract shop calling you. They
bill the client. They pay you. It really is cut and dried but there are
snags.
Lately, due to Obamacare (not a political statement), many businesses are
trying to reduce their impact from the healthcare laws. As such, many
contract shops are trying to recruit contractors on 1099s instead W-2s. This
makes the contractor appear to not be an employee, saving them from the
insurance issues, BUT this fails the IRS test for whether you are an
employee or independent contractor. The difference in rates they offer as
an incentive doesn't offset the expenses involved for you. For example, a
recent job call was $38 max on W-2, if they really had to, but they would go
$45 on 1099, which they really preferred. I would lose a lot more than the
$7 per hour difference going 1099.
W-2 if they set time, place, and other conditions on your work. If you know
you can telecommute, and they insist you work in the office, you are an
employee.
The IRS, until this recent IRS problem, would get you on it as they were
doing a lot of audits. (I was audited for 2009 and 2010. Passed both, with
additional refund.)
W-2 means you are an employee, and as such, you get unemployment benefits.
With a 1099, you need to show you are a business. You need your office,
business name, tax payment setup, and so on. You really are an independent
business, so like IBM contracting to XYZ Corp, you set your hours and your
schedule and they only specify a deadline, and unless the work cannot
physically be done offsite, you set your work location.
You have to pay your own taxes and Social Security. You are not eligible for
unemployment, group health care rates, or other benefits. While most don't
think about it, when you turn retirement age, you discover that while you
made $100,000 plus for a few years on a 1099, SS has nothing for you because
nothing was paid in. While hopefully no one here is relying on SS to retire,
there is no sense in throwing it away, either.
1099 is often handled by billing cycles, typically 30-, 60-, or 90-days,
although those trying to get around employee rules will pay weekly just like
a paycheck. If they pay weekly on a 1099, it should be a clue this is a bit
shady. This is how construction work handles illegal workers. You work, they
pay you on a 1099, they wash their hands of whether you are legal, illegal,
or anything.
A 1099 should be realistically almost twice a W-2. In the other part of this
thread, 15% cut was mentioned for the shop, but I know in the '80s and '90s
most were running from 25% to 33% and some shady ones would run as much as
50% of the billing to the client. So if you are a 1099, figure you are your
own shop, so that cut is now what needs to be tacked onto hat you be a
decent rate for you.
For example, if you work at $40 on W2, the shop is probably billing $60.
Figure loss of UI during downtime. When a job ends, your mortgage,
utilities, need for food don't stop. Normally much of this can be covered by
UI to lessen your impact. I figure that my downtime is two and a half months
average. I have walked from one job into another in a couple of weeks about
as often as being out for 3 or 4 months. As such, I plan to survive for
about 4 months without hitting real savings and only get nervous on jobs at
3 months. That is when I begin the real effort on getting a job.
Take the $300 UI pay per week (varies great on state - believe you are
California and last I saw that was like $480/week). $300 X 13 weeks (3
months) is $3900. Spread that across your work period to see what that adds
to your rate.
----- Original Message -----
From: "beelia" <beelia -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "Techwr-l" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:57 PM
Subject: Contract work - 1099 or W-2?
If you have a choice between getting paid on a W-2 or a 1099, which would
you choose?
I am starting to do contracting again after over a decade of direct
"captive" employment, and I don't remember what the advantages/drawbacks
are.
Can anyone direct me to a resource, or tell me what you've done in your
contracting careers?
Thanks
Bee
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com