TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Thank you everyone for the input - I'm still not 100% what we are going to
do. I like the idea of the RD fields, I've used them with a majority of
success in the past, and I am trying to convince IT to let us "restructure"
things so this would be an option. I remember the page numbering to be
tricky when using RD fields, so thank you for the pointers on that too.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Margaret Cekis
<Margaret -dot- Cekis -at- comcast -dot- net>wrote:
> Holly Deitelhoff asked about Master Documents in Word :
> "What is the general feel from people about Master Documents in Word? Are
> they mostly functional - where are the common problems - lessons learned
> from using them - adjustments that yield higher success rates ... etc?
> (I'm
> using Windows and Word 2007.) I have to build reports in excess of 1000
> pages for a customer and upgrading software is not an option.
> ___________________________________
> Holly,
> I agree with Dan that you can do it without Master Documents. I've built
> large docs from separate section or sub-doc files by completing each sub
> doc, then using Insert>File to add the successive sections. I do use
> sectional numbering with the section number. Section I is paged from 1-1 to
> 1-95, section 2 from 2-1 to 2-211, etc., and I use lowercase roman numerals
> for the front matter.
>
> The one thing you have to do is keep all the internal numbering consistent.
> Either use field codes or make sure that all your numbering selections
> match
> up , i.e.,, the numbered, lettered, and bulleted lists, and the sectional
> numbering all use the same panels in the number selection panels. If your
> numbered lists use the upper left box in one section, the comparable
> numbering in all the other sections should use the same panel, or
> everything
> will come apart and overwrite each other when you combine the sections.
> Good
> luck.
> Margaret Cekis, Johns Creek GA
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.