RE: Agent Ransack vs. Copernic Desktop

[Dan Goldstein <DGoldstein -at- cytomedix -dot- com>]

I used Copernic for a while in the Aughts, and I think Ransack's better. It works on network drives just fine, and it hasn't missed any files yet.


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Wyland
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 3:33 PM
To: Techwr-l
Subject: Agent Ransack vs. Copernic Desktop

Any thoughts on which is better?  I have the paid version of Copernic, which allows me to index network drives as well as local drives.  The searching seems to work well, but I have occasional doubts about files I *
*should** be able to find but seemingly can't.




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- 

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications?  Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions?  Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives