TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Question from a re-virginized newbie From:Hannah Drake <hannah -at- formulatrix -dot- com> To:beelia -at- pacbell -dot- net Date:Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:47:16 -0500
Bee, good point.
Actually, I'm relatively new to the field and have seen various articles
and discussion on DITA but still can't find a good entry point to begin to
understand what it is. Does anybody have any recommended resources?
Thanks in advance.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:02 PM, beelia <beelia -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> I'm a bit late chiming in on this, but I want to go back to the original
> question, because I think no one has considered the obvious. Mr. Webster is
> going to need a job!
>
> >My question is as follows: I have a limited amount of $ to spend on
> training, so given where the industry is headed, what utilit(ies) training
> should I pursue?
>
> My advice would be to look at all of the Technical Writer job listings you
> can find for your area, and see what skills are most in demand - then train
> yourself in those.
>
> In Silicon Valley, it's Madcap Flare and DITA, usually XMetaL/Trisoft. I
> have both of those skills and get recruited a lot, so I know those two are
> at the top of the TW job requirements list here.
>
> But the popular software in your area might be FrameMaker/RoboHelp or just
> plain Word. Check it out before you commit to training on any particular
> tool.
>
> HTH.
>
> Bee
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Scott Turner <quills -at- airmail -dot- net> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I know.
> >
> > > On Feb 26, 2014, at 12:31, Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> wrote:
> > >
> > > MS didn't eliminate the need for docs. They just eliminated the docs.
> > >
> > > Gene Kim-Eng
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Scott Turner <quills -at- airmail -dot- net>
> > wrote:
> > >> Oh, you mean like Microsoft did with it's Office suite?
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Doc-To-Help: new website, content widgets, and an output that works on
> any
> > screen.
> >
> > Learn more: http://bit.ly/1eRs4NS
> >
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as beelia -at- pacbell -dot- net -dot-
> >
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> > techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> >
> >
> > Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> > http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> > info.
> >
> > Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
> online
> > magazine at http://techwhirl.com
> >
> > Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> > email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
> >
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Doc-To-Help: new website, content widgets, and an output that works on any
> screen.
>
> Learn more: http://bit.ly/1eRs4NS
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as hannah -dot- drake -at- formulatrix -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
--
Hannah L. Drake
Lead Technical Documentation Specialist
Formulatrix, Inc.
781-788-0228 x137 (office)
617-610-6456 (cell)
hannah.drake.formulatrix (skype)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Doc-To-Help: new website, content widgets, and an output that works on any screen.