TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Terminology Question From:Haim Roman <haim -dot- roman -at- gmail -dot- com> To:"Lippincott, Richard" <RLippincott -at- as-e -dot- com> Date:Mon, 2 Jun 2014 21:00:42 +0300
I agree that you would call it "focus".
And I agree that the lack of a visible cursor is a bug that should be
reported & fixed.
_______________________________________________________________
Howard (Haim) Roman -- haim -dot- roman -at- gmail -dot- com -- 052-8-592-599 -- ×××× ××××
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Lippincott, Richard <RLippincott -at- as-e -dot- com>
wrote:
> >The situation is not unlike the difficulty with street-name signs in
> Massachusetts that has perhaps been fixed but probably not.
>
> Hasn't been fixed, but according to local legend this is an example of
> "it's not a bug, it's a feature."
>
> The conventional wisdom is that the practice began during the early to mid
> 1770s, when the local rebels started taking down some of the street name
> signs in order to confuse the British Army. Local residents would know what
> street they were on, the Redcoats wouldn't.
>
> So, it's a feature that has long since outlived its usefulness. Wow, good
> thing we never see things like that in our profession, right?
>
>
>
> Rick Lippincott, Technical Writer
> American Science and Engineering, Inc. | www.as-e.com
> Office +1-978-262-8807 | Fax +1-978-262-8702
> rlippincott -at- as-e -dot- com
> Follow us on Twitter @ase_detects
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+rlippincott=as-e -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [mailto:
> techwr-l-bounces+rlippincott=as-e -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of
> Peter Neilson
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 5:58 PM
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: Re: Terminology Question
>
> Yes, I agree. I'd call it a bug.
>
> The situation is not unlike the difficulty with street-name signs in
> Massachusetts that has perhaps been fixed but probably not. At any corner
> there might be a sign naming the minor street, but the bigger street was
> never identified. "Why should we give its name?" the DPW must have said to
> itself, "It's a waste of effort. If you're on the street you'll already
> know its name or you wouldn't be there."
>
> On Fri, 30 May 2014 15:26:16 -0400, Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
> wrote:
>
> > I probably wouldn't call it anything. "1. Type your user name and
> > press Enter. 2. Type your password and press enter."
> >
> > I'd enter a bug report about the missing cursor.
> >
> > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Joel W <eleysium -at- outlook -dot- com> wrote:
> >> Let's say you have a screen with several boxes / fields for entering
> >> data. The user moves from one box to the other, but there isn't a
> >> cursor in the box to indicate what box she is using. What do you call
> >> the presence in the box? i.e.:"Press enter. The ____ moves to the
> >> next box."
>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Doc-To-Help 2014 v1 now available. SharePoint 2013 support, NetHelp
> enhancements, and more. Read all about it.
>
> Learn more: http://bit.ly/NNcWqS
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as rlippincott -at- as-e -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Doc-To-Help 2014 v1 now available. SharePoint 2013 support, NetHelp
> enhancements, and more. Read all about it.
>
> Learn more: http://bit.ly/NNcWqS
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as haim -dot- roman -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Doc-To-Help 2014 v1 now available. SharePoint 2013 support, NetHelp enhancements, and more. Read all about it.