TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: What is not mandated is forbidden From:Milan DavidoviÄ <milan -dot- lists -at- gmail -dot- com> To:"McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com> Date:Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:28:17 -0400
Is anyone else objecting to these costs?
--Milan DavidoviÄ
Sent from my Commercial Visible 6
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:09 PM, McLauchlan, Kevin
<Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com> wrote:
> Your customers and potential customers, in the absence of any written statement of policy on such matters, will call and e-mail for reassurance, and X-many of your personnel will be tied up fielding those calls and e-mails and dispensing a boiler-plate response.
>
> ****
> Instead of fielding calls whenever a competitor gets a "new" competing product validated against "the latest" ABC standard (or an old one re-evaluated), you could make a statement in your docs that describes the thresholds and milestones in your product certification/validation cycle.
> Or not.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Doc-To-Help 2014 v1 now available. SharePoint 2013 support, NetHelp enhancements, and more. Read all about it.