TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Calling all math whizzes From:Sandy Harris <sandyinchina -at- gmail -dot- com> To:TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Sat, 18 Oct 2014 22:26:29 -0400
Chris Morton <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> I've never seen this nomenclature before: 2^80
>
> Does this mean 2 to the 80th power?
Yes.
> Is there a better way to express it, such as eliminating the carat and
> superscripting the 80?
That's another way. Whether it is better depends on context and audience.
> The target audience is IT folks running data centers and other web geeks. I
> don't think anyone can assume that each has a higher mathematics degree.
I think you can assume they'll understand 2^80. That is common usage
in geek email where superscripting is not an option.
I think there is at least one programming language that indicates the
operation that way, but do not currently recall which. Old Fortran
programmers might write 2**80, LISP folks (expt 2 80) and so on.
Most C/C++/C# programmers would recognise 2^80 as indicating
exponentiation in most contexts, but in some situations you'd
need a bit of care because ^ represents exclusive OR in C and
an ambiguity might appear.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork, communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help | http://bit.ly/1lRPd2l