TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Are there any industry standards for writing product dimensions (width, height, depth) ??
Subject:Re: Are there any industry standards for writing product dimensions (width, height, depth) ?? From:Shawn <shawn -at- cohodata -dot- com> To:James Witkin <jameswitkin -at- gmail -dot- com> Date:Thu, 27 Nov 2014 09:05:16 -0800
>I mentioned to my manager that I'd like to come up with a consistent
method for listing dimensions. He said "fine, but whichever order you
choose, I'd like to hear your justification."
Yikes! It is times like this that I feel fortunate not to have ever worked
for someone this unreasonable (or over-reaching).
Although consistency is very important... which order is chosen is
unimportant and justifying that order is just plain ridiculous!
My company builds SDN storage systems and the first spec sheet I designed,
listed dimensions as W x H x D - with bracketed metric values for each
dimension. With my most recent version, I present the dimensions as
annotations on images of our products. Annotations might be your answer!
You can justify this method by stating it offers a non-language specific
representation of the product's dimensions.
To lend credibility to my post, I analyzed a few specifications sheets for
you:
*LG External Blu-ray Disc Rewriter - DIMENSIONS (W x H x D) 6.1" x 0.8" x
6.5" (156 x 21.4 x 165.20 mm)2GIG-CNTRL2-345 - dimensions annotated in an
illustration*
*Dell EqualLogic ps5000e - Height: , Width:, Depth: , Weight:*
*EMC Avamar Data Store - Height, Width, Depth, Weight*
*Nexsan storage - Dimensions - Width 16.93 inches / 43.00 cm, Dimensions â
Height 3.9 inches / 8.81 cm (2U) 7 inches / 17.78 cm. (4U), Dimensions â
Depth*
*Eversync Data Protection - Width, Depth, Height HP StoreEasy 5000 Storage
- Dimensions (H x W x D) 5.19 x 17.64 x 34.01 in (13.18 x 44.80 x 86.38
cm)WD Caviar Green - Height (in./mm, max) 1.028/26.1 Length (in./mm, max)
5.787/147 Width (in./mm, Â .01 in.) 4/101.6 Weight (lb./kg, Â 10%)ZED PC
ZDT5J3 - Dimensions â 15X12.5X4.5 cm â 6X5X1.8 inch *
As you can see, there are many ways to present this information. The most
important goal is to present this information in a consistent and
understandable fashion.
Best regards and Happy Thanksgiving!
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:43 PM, James Witkin <jameswitkin -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> In my current job, I write and maintain a lot of product specifications.
> The previous tech writer followed no consistent method in how he ordered
> these dimensions. Some are arranged as width x height x depth. Some as
> height x depth x width. You get the idea.
>
> I mentioned to my manager that I'd like to come up with a consistent method
> for listing dimensions. He said "fine, but whichever order you choose, I'd
> like to hear your justification."
>
> Are there any industry standards for how to list dimensions? Is width or
> height always listed first? If there are standards, what is the thinking
> behind choosing one arrangement over another.
>
> PS. whichever way you celebrate it, have a wide, tall and deep
> Thanksgiving!
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork,
> communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help | http://bit.ly/1lRPd2l
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as shawn -at- cohodata -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork, communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help | http://bit.ly/1lRPd2l