TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Table layout - Which way is best? From:Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com> To:William Sherman <bsherman77 -at- embarqmail -dot- com>, TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Mon, 11 May 2015 09:08:21 -0700
I wouldn't use a table for that since the rows and columns don't
represent relationships among the items. It's just a lot of
time-consuming formattting that conveys no information.
To consolidate the list when the list items are short, you could use
multiple columns.
Consolidating a list by putting multiple list items on each line
instead looks amateurish to me.
If a style guide addressed that, I'd expect it to be covered under
lists, not tables.
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:38 AM, William Sherman
<bsherman77 -at- embarqmail -dot- com> wrote:
> At work, there have been a couple of people who have suddenly changed the
> directions of tables in our books.
>
> Currently, we have a table that goes vertical in the first pair of columns,
> then vertical in the second pair of columns.
>
> 1 Main Body 4 Undercarriage
> 2 Work Access 5 Track System
> 3. Power Plant 6 Operator Cab
>
>
> What they have done is go left right, then down.
>
> 1 Main Body 2 Work Access
> 3 Power Plant 4 Undercarriage
> 5 Track System 6 Operator Cab
>
> Now on something short, probably most don't see an issue but several tables
> that we have like this has 30 or more items called out.
>
> I have been trying to find something that gives a rule for this we can point
> to. I am sure I've heard of studies that down the first set, then down the
> second set (newspaper column style or regular multi-column style text) is
> the recommended and easiest to read, but I just can't find that now. Looking
> through Chicago Manual of Style, I'm apparently missing it if it is in
> there.
>
> Searching tables styles or layouts on the Internet gets me a lot of
> furniture links.
>
> Unfortunately, our style guide doesn't address this and I believe that they
> may decide to actually put this into the style guide, since one is a manger
> in another group.
>
> Anyone have any links or references?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adobe TCS 5: Get the Best of both worlds: modern publishing and best in class XML \ DITA authoring | http://adobe.ly/scpwfT