TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I think we're planning to migrate to Bitbucket, which I believe can do
the same thing.
Switching from XHTML source in Confluence to Markdown in files seems
like rolling back the clock five years, unless there's a wiki that
uses Markdown source. And even then, Prince is way more expensive than
Scroll PDF Exporter.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Ryan Young <ryangyoung -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> We're using a private GitHub repo, which is a sub-tree of a public repo. You
> might want to check it out, actually:
>https://github.com/ripple/ripple-dev-portal
>
> My co-worker is a pretty brilliant developer who created a tool that parses
> Markdown into HTML and PDF (through Prince), so we can single-source from
> those repos with different targets defined in a .yml config file. The PDF
> part is what's allowing us to move away from Confluence.
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Is that just basic Git or are you using Bitbucket or GitHub?
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Ryan Young <ryangyoung -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
>> > We've started using pull requests in Git for our reviews (our source is
>> > Markdown). Like Confluence, everyone can see each other's comments and
>> > you
>> > can have a conversation thread. It works especially well for revisions
>> > because you can see exactly what changed. It hasn't been that long, but
>> > I've begun to prefer it to Confluence because it limits comments to the
>> > review period. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com