TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Resistance to allowing anonymous web access to online help?
Subject:Re: Resistance to allowing anonymous web access to online help? From:Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com> To:"techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Sun, 19 Jun 2016 11:04:40 -0700
That's not a serious level of protection.
I've worked at several places where the docs were distributed only
under NDA and anything online was on a secure web server that required
a password. I doubt anyone really thought it would stop competitors
from getting their hands on the product and docs. Maybe the rationale
was that it would make a stronger case in court if they appeared to
steal anything. Or that the competitors' coders might refuse to read
the stolen docs.
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 11:40 AM, John G <john -at- garisons -dot- com> wrote:
> ... All our documentation is online, but we are not allowed to let it be
> indexed and made available to search engines. If someone has the URL for a
> document or one of its pages, they can access it. The product owners are
> afraid that the competition will be able to use our documentation to
> potentially reverse engineer our applications. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com