TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
While water only falls in one direction, it can still make quite a mess
when the liquid meets a solid surface (or deadline).
I recall numerous times documenting waterfall projects where the end result
bore little resemblance to what they said they were going to produce.
I kinda like agile better - I actually get to see what's being developed
every two weeks in the reveal. I have a much better sense of what will
actually result from the developers' efforts.
My 2Â,
JG
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Keith Hood <bus -dot- write -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> And they didn't use "Agile" methods. The waterfall model was beautiful in
> that it made the end result entirely predictable - water falls in only one
> direction.
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:14 PM, Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> wrote:
>
> > In the olden days before software, just about everything was documented
> > before it existed. Because you can actually predict what most machinery
> is
> > going to do based on the drawings.
> >
> > Gene Kim-Eng
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Dan Goldstein <DGoldstein -at- nuot -dot- com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Ya gotta be pretty creative to document something that doesn't exist:
> >>
> >
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy
> and
> > content development | http://techwhirl.com
> >
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as bus -dot- write -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
> >
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> > techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> >
> >
> > Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> > http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> > info.
> >
> > Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
> online
> > magazine at http://techwhirl.com
> >
> > Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> > email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
> >
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and
> content development | http://techwhirl.com
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as vwritert -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com
