TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Yes, it seems the best search solutions do require that you not use
file://, which means having at least a local server.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Chris Despopoulos <
despopoulos_chriss -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:
> I implemented my own search for my doc system. We deliver on the product
> server, and use the product server to serve up the help. BUT... I'm not
> allowed to put too much processing onto the server. So I implemented
> search in the client. I include stemming so it's kind of fuzzy. What I
> don't do is both fuzzy AND literal phrase searching. That (as far as I
> know) would require two indexes, and the absolute phrase index would be
> bigger than the stemmed index. I don't know... Maybe I'll figure out a
> way to do that...
> I had looked around at the time, and didn't find anything free to use.
> But it turns out that now there are some open source technologies out
> there.
>
> Here's one I found that looks interesting.
>https://github.com/cebe/js-search
>
> I would say, look for in-client search or js search.
> One caveat... I believe these won't work if you want to deliver your docs
> with a file:// protocol. It needs to he http:// or https:// -- For
> security reasons, Javascript doesn't do all it knows how to do when you
> access content via file://
> cud
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and
> content development | http://techwhirl.com
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as loisrpatterson -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com