TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Book on Modern Technical Writing From:Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com> To:TECHWR-L Writing <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Fri, 29 Jul 2016 11:11:29 -0700
A lot of my users grew up with the web, as did most of the UX
designers I've worked with in recent years.
Modern UIs are typically generated in a web browser from JavaScript
calls to multiple REST APIs. Typically it's a bunch of task-specific
pages. Different pages often use different libraries to use different
things with the same data. Often some pages are user-configurable.
Commonly there are API references users can use to extend the UI or
bypass it.
I don't see how that's "one complex UI." That seems like a straw man.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:57 AM, <mbaker -at- analecta -dot- com> wrote:
> Depends on what you understand monolithic to mean. Yes, all software is a
> mashup. I use monolithic to mean that that mashup has been tightly coupled
> and integrated in one complex UI. There are many people who not only prefer
> to do their entire job in one window, but insist that it is the hallmark of
> a mature tool. Basically, they don't think any authoring tool is mature
> unless it looks and feels like Microsoft Word.
>
> To me, that is desktop thinking. But we are dealing with a generation that
> grew up on the desktop.
>
> In many ways the post-desktop world does look very similar to the
> pre-desktop world, which does make it easy to dismiss it as a throwback
> rather than as progress. But the desktop world was really shaped by the fact
> that small cheap computers proliferated before cheap connectivity was
> available. It forced computing from its natural environment on the network
> onto the strange small world of the desktop.
>
> The Web has liberated us from that strange small world, but that strange
> small world has been home for so long that we still have trouble thinking
> outside its confines or working outside its modes.
>
> This is perhaps part and parcel of why we still have a hard time thinking in
> terms of hypertext. The book is the paper equivalent of the desktop
> computer.
>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+mbaker=analecta -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+mbaker=analecta -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf
> Of Robert Lauriston
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 1:46 PM
> To: TECHWR-L Writing <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
> Subject: Re: Book on Modern Technical Writing
>
> Modern applications are not monolithic. They're mashups of various
> open-source components with some proprietary magic sauce worth paying for
> running on clusters of commodity VMs run by Amazon or Google.
>
> In one sense, the complexity continues to increase. In another sense, things
> become simpler, because the interoperation of the open-source building
> blocks can increasingly be taken as a given and managed at an ever higher
> level. Instead of configuring a UNIX server from scratch you can just spawn
> a VM with the stack you need from an online library of images, or spawn a
> whole cluster into a Docker Datacenter.
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:19 AM, <mbaker -at- analecta -dot- com> wrote:
>> Yes, there are those who see the modern and the futuristic as
>> consisting of ever more complex monolithic systems. And there are
>> those who see the modern and the futuristic as consisting of small pieces
> loosely joined. ...
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and
> content development | http://techwhirl.com
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as mbaker -at- analecta -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com