TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I also didn't get it, and so assumed I was missing something obvious. It
read pretty well to me, and I didn't take it to be denigrating typography
at all â rather, it pointed out that implementing decent typography can be
trickier than one might think.
Joe
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 3:09 PM, <mbaker -at- analecta -dot- com> wrote:
> I too am puzzled. What's the objection to the article? It strikes me a well
> written and well-illustrated. All in all, an exemplary bit of technical
> communication. No idea what is supposed to be sickening about it.
>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+mbaker=analecta -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+mbaker=analecta -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf
> Of Wright, Lynne
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 9:21 AM
> To: Steve Hudson <sh1448291904 -at- gmail -dot- com>; austechwriter -at- freelists -dot- org;
> techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: RE: Sickening stuff from Engineers
>
> Are you implying that the content of the article is somehow wrong or
> objectionable?
>
> I used to be a typesetter back in the day, using a DOS-based program to
> generate galleys for print production. Given how limited the options for
> finessing type were back then, I found this article pretty
> interesting/illuminating in terms of how to work with digital type for
> electronic media.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+lynne -dot- wright=kronos -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+lynne -dot- wright=kronos -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On
> Behalf Of Steve Hudson
> Sent: August-28-16 12:12 PM
> To: austechwriter -at- freelists -dot- org; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: Sickening stuff from Engineers
>
>https://medium.engineering/typography-is-impossible-
> 5872b0c7f891#.h6obkxudm
>
> Of course, I couldn't read that without a comment.
>
> To you guys, I will say this. This link contains high macabre comedy
> regarding how an engineer approaches typography. I need medicating
> urgently.
>
> Steve Hudson
> Word Heretic
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com