TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
You know, I saw parts of the whole thread and figured I'd read the article and come away with an entirely different viewpoint, based on the replies.
I have to confess that upon reading the beginning of this article, I had the same experience as the OP: it leaves you with a kind of sickening feeling in the stomach.
I didn't read the whole thing but scanning through, it seems to have that same tone.
It's uninspiring and not creative at all. In fact it seems to take all the joy out of the creative aspects of publishing and typography.
Very dry, very dull, and very unpleasant.
Never thought I'd be agreeing with the OP but he's right on.
Steve
On Sunday, August 28, 2016 9:12 AM, Steve Hudson wrote:
Of course, I couldn't read that without a comment.
To you guys, I will say this. This link contains high macabre comedy regarding how an engineer approaches typography. I need medicating urgently.
Steve Hudson
Word Heretic
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com