TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: What would you do? From:Lauren <lauren -at- writeco -dot- net> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Wed, 8 Feb 2017 22:34:46 -0800
This is very common for me in Sacramento where recruiters for contract
positions with the State of California and the county claim to be
"preferred vendors" and are based in India with a domestic presence
somewhere in the country. The county and a local community power company
told me that they do not outsource, yet most of the presented positions
and interviews I have had with the county are from Indian companies and
the community power positions quit showing up after I contacted that
company. I don't know what sort of company you are working with but
here my experience with a similar problem.
The Indian companies that do most of the recruiting seem to almost
always want "puffing" in excess of the truth. "Stretch your experience
with this," "build up your employer for that," "can you say you have
experience here?" The truth is, the Indian companies are taking over the
IT market in government and high-tech, so if you cannot comply with what
they want, they will find someone who can. Honest business may have to
follow suit to compete.
I am too honest to work in this market anymore and I don't know of any
lateral move I can make. Sacramento county, the State of California, and
high tech companies work with the Indian contractors and the Indian
companies are who is hiring. They are also pushing out local small
business recruiters. Until government and high tech employers put a stop
the outsourcing, the dishonest representation will continue. As it is,
government hiring is complacent to outsourcing because the Indian
companies maintain a domestic presence somewhere. Technology companies
have always used international employment.
For some reason, the most common recruiting firm I have seen lately is
22nd Century Staffing Inc. (TCSI) I mis-dialed a recruiter once and got
their Indian call center. They confirmed that I was calling the right
company and that they were based in India but I talked to someone who
did not have a good grasp of American English. She kept asking me for
information so she could route my call. I told her I didn't want to talk
to an Indian call center. When I have talked to several other recruiters
from TCSI for the different positions they have contacted me about, they
all tell me they are an American company based in Virginia and all of
their recruiters have been Indian. The company offers higher than
average hourly rates and does not provide any personal interaction, like
interview preparation or follow-up.
Here is what the company says about itself, "22nd Century Staffing Inc.
(TSCSI) is the fastest growing staffing company in North America and the
only firm of its kind specialized in all type of staffing services.
TSCSI with its Headquarters in Ashburn, VA with presence in 30+ states
of the Nation. TSCSI has over 50+ Information Technology & General
Staffing Services contracts in place with numerous United States
Government and Private sector Agencies."
They do get some good reviews on glassdoor from "employees," however,
they have a lot of recruiters who are also employees looking for more
people. The positive reviews for TCSI are often anonymous and contain
English errors that are typical in recruiter emails.
I don't know what to do when the recruiters want very specific skill
sets and ask me to lie on my resume. I don't lie.
On 2/8/2017 11:12 AM, Keith Hood wrote:
I have been corresponding with a recruiting firm about a possible job as a
SharePoint administrator, and they asked me to change my resume. The job
description includes some things that I have never worked with, such as
Infopath. The recruiter asked me to edit my resume to show experience with
about half a dozen things I've never done, to match things in the
description, and email him that new version.
I won't say what I've done or not done - I'm interested in your thoughts
about it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as lauren -at- writeco -dot- net -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com