Peer Editing Among Corporate Tech Writing Teams

[David Renn <daverenn08 -at- gmail -dot- com>]

I work in a Tech Writing Department of about 3 managers and 14 writers. Our
team used to have a dedicated copyeditor for the whole team. We're now
restructuring the department so that all authors are responsible for peer
reviews in place of having a copyeditor.

Have any of you ever had any experience where peer editing was implemented
across a team of multiple tech writers---whether small or large teams?

If so, would you be able to shed any light on the methodology your team
implemented for the peer review process; that is, the team structure, how
tasks were assigned/divvied up, what peer reviewers were required to review
for, how team ensured the process was implemented appropriately, or
anything else related?

And also, do you have any thoughts as to:

   - the pros and cons of implementing peer editing in multiple-author tech
   departments;
   - what it might take to create a well-oiled peer editing machine where
   all authors know and understand their role/responsibilities and are
   dedicated to their assignments;
   - any success/failure stories in general.

Thanks, and I look forward to hearing about your experiences!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- 

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications?  Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions?  Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives