TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Ethics in Technical Writing From:"Elisa R. Sawyer" <elisawyer -at- gmail -dot- com> To:Lauren <lauren -at- writeco -dot- net> Date:Mon, 1 May 2017 15:16:23 -0700
Please never, never question whether I value ethics.
To suggest that I don't value ethics is the most insulting thing that you
can ever do to me.
-Elisa
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Lauren <lauren -at- writeco -dot- net> wrote:
> Iâm not discussing the âphrase in question,â Iâm discussing the ethical
> principle that the discussion about the phrase raised. Perhaps you do not
> value ethics in technical writing. Your statement about the phrase being
> âan actual quote or just some random jargon,â underscores the need of
> technical writing ethics. The lack of discussion on the subject of ethics
> underscores a lack of interest in ethics among technical writers.
>
> It is artificial job security when documentation is wrong and the
> technical writer can blame the SME because the technical writer will be
> called on to fix bad documentation. That approach is not ethical. We do not
> know what the original phrase was but for all posterity, technical writers
> freely provided opinions on how to make a bad instruction grammatically
> correct, while the grammatical correction could change the instruction.
>
> Ethics, if any are followed, would be breached if grammatical rules were
> followed over the accuracy of instruction. It is a dangerous practice if
> ethics like this are never followed. So why is it that technical writers
> neither discuss nor care to follow ethics? Why are SMEs held accountable
> for bad instruction when a technical writer may be the last person to see a
> document before it is released and can determine if an instruction is vague?
>
>
>
> On 4/30/2017 10:49 AM, Robert Lauriston wrote:
>
>> You guys have certainly gone to remarkable lengths in discussing this
>> given that we don't know whether the phrase in question was an actual
>> quote or just some random jargon the original poster made up in the
>> style of his English-challenged SMEs.
>>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and
> content development | http://techwhirl.com
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as elisawyer -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
--
Elisa Rood Sawyer
~~~~~^~~~~~
Technical and Creative Writer
"Apparently there is nothing that cannot happen today." Mark Twain
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com