TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: 2. What's your preference: One long page or several small pages?
Subject:Re: 2. What's your preference: One long page or several small pages? From:John G <john -at- garisons -dot- com> To:Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca> Date:Fri, 3 Aug 2018 13:01:05 -0400
Yeah - Expando is a pain. But then, so is the progress bar and the
Previous/Next buttons on the thing we have implemented here ... kind of
another reason I want to make sure it's worth the pain of doing.
And then I recall Edmond Weiss' First Law of documentation: That which is
easy and best for the user is difficult and time consuming for the
documentor.
JG
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 11:53 AM Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca> wrote:
> Hey John,
>
> I found expansion macros time consuming and actually harder to implement.
> If this is the way your team decides to go, look into the Expando macro for
> automating the accordion function based on heading levels.
>
> Other options for long pages is a sidebar TOC. Before I left BMC they
> implemented a really skookum sidebar on their docs page:
>http://bit.ly/2ObHVg3
>
>
> As for personal preference, I much prefer shorter topics that focus on a
> specific concept. For web content, shorter pages give easier targets for
> people who search. For instance, the search for "test credit cards cognito
> forms" (without quotes) pulls this page automatically:
>http://bit.ly/2M0gdFr
>
> If this content were on a longer page, it might not be so easily found.
>
> Cheers,
> -Tony
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 8:44 AM, John G <john -at- garisons -dot- com> wrote:
>
> > We use Expand macros in places, but not for this. It's under
> consideration
> > too.
> >
> > JG
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 9:28 AM Kevin Ryan <kryan -at- harriscomputer -dot- com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > RE: 2. What's your preference: One long page or several small pages?
> > >
> > > John,
> > >
> > > Have you considered hiding subsections/sub-instructions under
> > Confluence's
> > > Expand macro? This might allow you to economize on screen vertical
> space
> > > and still keep the full load of information available for readers who
> > want
> > > it.
> > >
> > > Kevin Ryan
> > >
> > > Kevin Ryan
> > > Technical Writer, Research & Development
> > > P: 802-865-1170x82412
> > > F: 802-865-1171
> > > E: kryan -at- harriscomputer -dot- com
> > > 10 E
> > > Allen Street
> > > Suite 201
> > > Winooski, VT 05404
> > > www.ssivt.com
> > > This message has been sent on behalf
> > > of a company that is part of the Harris Operating Group of
> > > Constellation Software Inc. These companies are listed
> > > here
> > > .
> > > If you
> > > prefer not to be contacted by Harris Operating Group
> > > please notify
> > > us
> > > .
> > > This message is intended exclusively for the
> > > individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication
> > > may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
> > > confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are
> > > not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print,
> > > retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you
> > > have received this message in error, please notify the sender
> > > immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the
> > > message.
> > >
> > >
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy
> and
> > content development | http://techwhirl.com
> >
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca -dot-
> >
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> > techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> >
> >
> > Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> > http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> > info.
> >
> > Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
> online
> > magazine at http://techwhirl.com
> >
> > Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> > email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
> >
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and
> content development | http://techwhirl.com
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as vwritert -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com