Re: Aw: Re: AI-based writing assistants
Well, that's the difference between verification and validation of automated functions. If you have to fact-check it every time, that's manual verification. If you can validate it to be more reliable than a human performing the same activity, then it becomes a viable alternative.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | https://techwhirl.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
Follow-Ups:
- Re: Aw: Re: AI-based writing assistants, Peter Neilson
References:
Re: Aw: Re: AI-based writing assistants: From: Keith Soltys
Re: Aw: Re: AI-based writing assistants: From: Dan Goldstein
Previous by Author:
Re: Aw: Re: AI-based writing assistants
Next by Author:
Re: Aw: Re: AI-based writing assistants
Previous by Thread:
Re: Aw: Re: AI-based writing assistants
Next by Thread:
Re: Aw: Re: AI-based writing assistants
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads