TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Technical Writers vs. Technical Communicators From:lpraderio <lpraderi -at- CLIFF -dot- WHOI -dot- EDU> Date:Wed, 26 May 1993 15:31:47 EDT
Yes, there is a difference between a tech writer and a tech comm.
More and more, I find myself trying to convey information and instruction in
media other than in a written form. I think technical communication (versus
tech writing) offers great variety to my work and life. Even my most beloved
pastime would become hateful if I were subject to doing it 40 hours/week, week-
in, week-out. Yuck!
I like variety to break up the day, give my brain a rest from writing, and
learn new things; tech communication does this for me. Curiously enough, I'm
not sure all this technology is really making us more productive?! I have to
spend more time to learn my desktop-publishing software (if I can even get a
hold of some training tapes) but doing my work with the program, once I've
mastered it, is more freeing and exciting than boring, old run program software.
B-)
Laura Praderio
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
lpraderio -at- whoi -dot- edu
Hi All,
Recently, in an article about SGML, Elizabeth Gilmore said: "For authors this
means that we can focus on writing content. We can be writers without having
to be desktop publishers as well. We can devote ourselves to conveying
meaningful information..."
Now, I have come to think of myself not just as an author or technical writer,
but as a technical communicator. The difference, as I see it, is that I am
comfortable in a variety of mediums besides print, and that often to properly
convey information I have to make sure that information is presented in the
right way.
Sure your words may be meaningful, but with the wrong presentation, the
message can be lost.
With ISO 8879 SGML are we going to, in some ways, change back to a medium we
have essentially discarded as the sole source of information?
I know that the advantage of SGML is that the definition of its elements is
a structured process, and that furthermore standards are being developed to
make SGML multimedia, but are we back to being writers and not communicators?
Can we really setup information using these tools without thought to the final
format(s)?? Even with an explicit structure?
Does anyone else feel that there's a difference here?
[Journal of the Society of Technical Communication, Second Quarter, May 1993,
"Introducing Today's SGML", Elizabeth Gilmore]